Facilitator dashboard

Signal, Edit, Support

Developed by Ishan • Designed by Nicole

What it does: turns short chat responses into public stance cards, a visible class wall, and two balanced debate teams.

Debate question

In a fast moving community event, should the system first maximize open signaling, or tighter coordination and selective visibility?

Live controls

Session

Waiting for submissions.

Participants

0

Open Signal Team

0

Selective Stewardship Team

0

Debate sides

Ready to read

Open Signal Team: argue that fast, broad participation helps the community build situational awareness.

Selective Stewardship Team: argue that verification, coordination, and bounded visibility protect quality and trust.

Run of show

Suggested timing
  1. Two minutes to explain the scenario and the debate prompt.
  2. Three minutes for participants to chat with the digital friend.
  3. One minute to build balanced teams and show the wall.
  4. Two minutes for team prep.
  5. Two short debate rounds and one final vote.

How the activity maps to the readings

Three lenses

1. Public updates and situational awareness

The first turn asks what kind of post actually helps people understand a fast moving event. Good answers usually include place, change, and action.

2. Wikipedia style coordination

The second turn asks how a shared page should be coordinated so more contributors improve quality instead of creating chaos and duplication.

3. Ties, support, and visibility

The third turn asks which ties matter first and what should stay public or bounded, so students think about reach, trust, and social support together.

Participants and stance cards

Not updated